obc voice

Monday, July 17, 2006

one bc voice

The state has blocked my voice. So I tried to infiltrate into the Indian etherwaves through Pakistan, by assuming a new identity (http://pkblogs.com/obcvoice). Would that work? Not everyone likes a proxy warrior. So, I have opened another front (http://onebc.blogsome.com) .

onebc ? Because someone has stolen my identity too. The state ignored the existence of the OBCs for half a century - now, a patriotic blogger has decided I should remain non grata.

I would continue to post as obc voice at blogspot - but I’d be posting as onebc at blogsome.

I’ve managed to retain the title at blogsome..but only just. The title is Obc voice (note that only the first letter is in uppercase) at blogsome and obc voice (all lowercase) at blogspot.

If obc voice continues to remain stifled, now you know who to tune into - onebc.

Saturday, July 15, 2006

'Jitenge ya losenge..'

When Rajiv Gandhi said that, more than two decades ago at an election rally, he revealed not just how little he knew about the language and idiom of the Indian people..but also about Indian reality. But the Indian people, in their largeheartedness, laughed that away and gave him the biggest majority ever in Indian history.

Now, I present to you a piece of advice from a gentleman who, unlike Rajiv Gandhi, went to a University and actually studied and..excelled there.., but seems to be as out of touch with Indian reality as the former Prime Minister..and as capable of provoking unintended humour. Listen to Pratap Bhanu Mehta ::

'We should refrain from accepting the blocks the Indian polity assigns us to- SC, ST, OBC, OC and the like. These identities should be given up by us!!'

So, that seems a good piece of advice..what's funny about it, you ask? There's nothing funny about the advice (I find it disingenuous, in fact)..it was his choice of audience that was funny - he was talking to a group of upper caste students fighting for 'equality' at JNU when he said that.

When will reservations stop?

How long will the policy of reservations be continued? As long as the upper caste elite in the bureacracy in particular and the country in general ...and the rats eating away the 'steel framework' of the Indian state want it to.. Read what Sharad Yadav, President of the Janata Dal (United) has to say here about the implementation of the reservations policy by the UPSC.. An excerpt:

"Under the reservation policy, 49.50 per cent of the seats is reserved. The remaining 50.50 per cent is open to all. Candidates who qualify for the civil services by dint of their merit alone should be enlisted in general open categories. After all, there is no bar on SC and ST candidates fighting elections for general seats. Many leaders, including Kansi Ram and B.P. Maurya, have fought and won from general seats. General seats do not mean seats reserved for people belonging to non-reserved categories. Similarly, general open seats in the civil services are not reserved for people belonging to non-reserved categories. The Government of India has not reserved hundred per cent of the seats of the civil services. In fact, it cannot do so. There is a 50 per cent ceiling placed on reservation by the Supreme Court. But in effect, the UPSC and the DOPT are implementing reservation policy to ensure 50.50 per cent reservation for the unreserved categories that are supposed to form just 15 per cent of the Indian population.

For the last civil services examination, around 214 of 425 seats were general open merit seats. Out of the first 214 candidates, 50 were from reserved categories. Forty of them were from OBCs. But the UPSC refused to allow reserved category candidates to enlist themselves as general candidates. Twenty seven per cent of 425 is 117: this is the exact number of candidates belonging to OBCs who were declared successful. Even those in the top 10 were classified as reserved category candidates! By doing this, the UPSC has denigrated meritorious candidates from the reserved categories. It has also denied jobs in the civil services to an equal number of reserved category candidates. In fact, 157 candidates from OBC categories should have been selected: 40 on the basis of merit and 117 on the basis of the 27 per cent reservation extended to them. "

I find the term 'bizarre', that Sharad Yadav himself uses, an accurate description of the attitude that seems to inform the UPSC. 'It has transformed' as he says, 'the policy of reservations into a policy of communal awards'. And Mr.Yadav also cites several rulings of the highest court in the land to point out how this attitude clearly violates the essence of those rulings.

Mr.Yadav concludes : " The interesting question arises: who is perpetuating reservation? If people from the SCs, STs, and OBCs get representation according to their population, the scheme of reservation will come to an end. But who is depriving the meritorious from getting jobs as general category candidates? "

I thank the excellent blogger mineguruji, whose blog is a veritable repository of some of the most interesting news and the best writing on reservations related issues, for posting Mr.Yadav's article in full.

Friday, July 14, 2006

Know your Dharma : know your place

Wandering, looking for other information.. I found this little article in a newspaper, two days ago. A glittering, timeless nugget of wisdom (it was titled Age of wisdom : caste jobs - the day's 'quota' of spiritual victuals, I suppose, in that newspaper), I just couldn't let it lie there.. I thought it could make all of us a little 'wiser'. So I'm posting/pasting it here :

' All Hindu religious and legal treatises always stress on the importance of the caste system and keep repeating the importance of keeping it pure by adhering to the tenets of occupation, inheritance and even interaction among the four castes.

According to the Vasishta Dharmashastra, the six lawful occupations for Brahmins are studying the Vedas, teaching, performing sacrifices for self and for others, giving and accepting alms. For Kshatriyas, the three lawful occupations are studying, performing sacrifices for self, and giving alms and gifts. With knowledge and security issues taken care of by the Brahmins and the Kshatriyas, the service tasks fall in the lot of the Vaishyas and Shudras.

The legal treatises provide a loophole for people who cannot or are not willing to follow the traditional occupations prescribed for their castes. These people are allowed to adopt the lawful occupation of other castes, but the castes should be lower than theirs. So, in effect, no one can take over (the) work of a Brahmin.'

So all aspirations to move up are unlawful.

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Bad Treatment

Dr.P.Venugopal, Director - AIIMS, has been dismissed... by Dr.Ramadoss. Politicians treat their fellow politicians very badly at times.

CNN-IBN seems to agree - its headline for the story is 'Bad Treatment'. I agree it's bad treatment.Wonder what CNN-IBN, in retrospect, would call the treatment - abuse, innuendoes..the jokes meted out to 'quota doctors' by the students, doctors employed by AIIMS from its hallowed, 'autonomous' precincts ? Good, clean fun?